I’m not prone to envy. Dig deep enough and you’ll find we all share similar issues and daily problems. After leaving the offices of VSA partners in Chicago, however, I felt that green monster on my back. Badly. In the past month, three different well-known designers told me that VSA was the country’s leading design firm. Jamie Koval is one of the partners driving this creative engine. Jamie’s work is deceptively simple. The solutions seem effortless and clear. This betrays a reality that is complex, multilayered and very smart. The same can be said of Jamie personally. One of the most pleasant surprises in life is meeting a designer that you’ve always admired and finding him affable, charming and humble. Recently, Jamie and I took a break on the lawn at the Sundance resort in Utah, and I grilled him. Being the affable, charming, humble person he is, he answered my questions without duress.
SA: Jamie, before we jump into the work, I’d love to know some basics.
Where are you from, where did you go to school, what was your first job?
JK: I grew up in Winnetka, Ill., part of what’s known as the North Shore, a stretch of towns along Lake Michigan just north of Chicago. For college I chose to go to Kansas—yes, that graphic design epicenter known as the University of Kansas—because I wanted
to attend a university with a strong design school rather than art
school. I received a degree in Visual Communication with a minor
in Journalism. After I graduated, I traveled to Switzerland to
attend a summer program with Kent State University and studied
design just outside Zurich.
My first job in the industry was working for a small advertising agency on Michigan Avenue. It was a summer job, I was a senior in high school, and I loved it. I was already a teenage workaholic.
I would take the train from home into the city, ride a commuter
boat from the train station up the Chicago River to the steps of
the Wrigley Building. I thought I had arrived. The agency was
small and adorned with personalities, like an ad-agency version of
WKRP in Cincinnati. It was a great place to gain perspective.
SA: And how did you end up in design?

When Bellsouth and SBC Communications merged, Koval developed the new company’s brand, from strategy to name to visual identity. VSA named the company Cingular, denoting the single refreshing alternative in the wireless industry and a means for human expression. Cingular is arguably one of the most successful brand names launched in the last 10 years.
JK: Probably like most designers, I was blessed and cursed with the
ability to draw, and that kept leading me to design. Even when I was
really young, I loved type. I knew I was going to do something with
art. I remember being 11 years old and painting with my grandfather
on Saturday during the winter months. I sold one of my oil paintings
to a very good friend of my father. He paid me $50, and I was convinced
I was rich. Or at least commercially viable.
SA: So, if your first job was at WKRP in Cincinnati, VSA seems
like The West Wing. I’ve always been confused about how VSA
works. Whenever I’ve been in the office, it seems like a well-oiled
machine filled with amazing talent. But you have several partners and
lots of people. Do you have teams; do you share projects, who has the
final say on a direction?
JK: Here in Chicago, which is our first and largest office, we do
function primarily in separate teams. There are four creative
partners, each of whom manages between 10 and 15 people. Our
teams are a pretty interesting mix of designers who think strategically,
writers who can think visually, strategists who can write,
and account people who can strategize ... all of whom see design as
the means of solving a communication or business problem. People
who come into our office have compared it to a newsroom, grad
school or air traffic control. Most often the partners run our teams
independently, but we collaborate from time to time to share
resources or respond to the demand of a major program.
As a partner, my role is multifaceted, starting with business development, creative direction, through staffing and leading my team. Although my team is amazing, I have overall responsibility for everything we produce, so I’m involved in every design decision.
Which is what I love in the first place.
SA: So much of your work is large scale, long term corporate projects.
These involve large scale politics. How do you handle this and maintain
the ability to do unexpected, exciting work?
JK: You make it sound like road construction. To a degree you’re right, because large scale corporate assignments naturally attract attention from multiple internal stakeholders with differing agendas: lawyers, accountants, HR, corporate brand managers, internal designers. Did I mention lawyers? And then there are process challenges: budget, timing, research, testing, approvals.
But what’s exhilarating to me about these enterprise-scale engagements is that there is so much at stake for the client’s organization.
And we have a seat at the table with leadership in making
a change. In these types of engagements, companies are trusting
us not to produce more stuff, but to deliver something of real, lasting
impact. My greatest success in building big, corporate branding
or communication assignments comes when we lead with
strategy and then produce beautiful, compelling work.
It sounds simple. But how you scope and stage an assignment
is critical to its outcome, which is why research and strategy are
elemental to our work. And then once the stage is set, you need
to deliver something that you find compelling and that you know
will resonate with the market. Creating the unexpected is always
about combining intelligence about the audience with instinct for
the right aesthetic.
Oh, and it helps that I just enjoy it. I’ve done programmatic
work for clients large and small, emerging and established, and I
like getting my fingers into everything, from positioning, to identity
and naming, to every visual expression imaginable. I also like
variety and transferring what I know in one industry to a different
set of challenges in another. That’s why I intentionally try to vary
my clients, industry sectors and types of assignments. The common
denominator is that I try to choose assignments where there
is creative opportunity, where I can work with and learn from talented
people and have a chance to raise the trajectory of a company
or brand.
SA: That’s what makes your work rare: It is smart, but it’s also incredibly
skilled. One of the other aspects of VSA’s work that I admire is the commitment
to craft. Within that is the ability to not fall into the current groovy
trends. The latest promotion you did for Mohawk, the Strathmore promo,
is a perfect example of this. What was your thinking on that project?
JK: You know how you can look at a house built in the 1920s, and it makes perfect design sense, even today? It’s never going to be seen as trendy or faddish. It’s timeless. It stays relevant. It has integrity. I see my work as never really in fashion, and hopefully never out of fashion. I’ve always gravitated toward classic sensibilities in my work not only because I like it, but because that’s how I’m wired. I just see things this way. So there has always been a timeless quality about VSA’s work that I really can’t explain. I’ve heard it termed “responsible.” Others have said it’s a Chicago thing, but I don’t think that’s it either. I just like things to feel current, not new. I like modern, but not state of the art.
Familiar and accessible, but a little hard to peg. I suspect it all
comes back to the desire to create something of lasting value
rather than something disposable.
Launching Strathmore for Mohawk was a dream assignment.
It was strategic, programmatic and creative—everything I enjoy. My goal was to begin by offering emerging designers an insider’s perspective on writing and identity. These were two types of projects that happen on Strathmore paper, a story that hadn’t been told effectively in the marketplace. We developed an aesthetic for the program that was bold and recognizable to a more commercial, less design-savvy market, and added a depth of detail, wit and finishing so that a more discerning audience might respond as well.
See? There’s the creative not falling far from the strategy again.
SA: We’ve been hearing for years about the death of the annual report and
the switch to electronic communication for corporations. What are your
thoughts about printed matter? How is it changing?
JK: Well, the reports of the AR’s death aren’t necessarily exaggerated. They’re just missing the real story. I think there will always be certain companies that believe the purpose of an annual is simply to fulfill a regulatory requirement. And those reports will naturally devolve to a non-designed print version or static online presentation.
But for those who see a strategic purpose in the report, they’re
looking for new ways to leverage it to reach more a specific audience
or send a specific message. And those tend to be the AR clients VSA
attracts—although in the interest of full Sarbanes-Oxley-style disclosure,
I feel compelled to point out that annuals are an increasingly
small percentage of VSA’s overall business as we’ve diversified
our work over the years. I am under oath here, right?
Anyway, what we see first and foremost is that annual reports
are no longer a one-size-fits-all proposition. In some cases, companies
pursue a full annual, others choose a summary report, a 10K
wrap or just an online report. There are companies that communicate
both in print and online. Which is why we address each company
differently.
For instance, Ameritrade was a client that had historically produced
both a print and an online report, and we migrated them
exclusively online because it was appropriate to their business and
brand. For GE’s annual report and website, we converted what
would have otherwise been financial tables into an online experience
by adding interactivity to them. Then there are companies
like our client BP that see corporate reporting as a library of print
communications that combine to address financial, social and
environmental performance.

The Dear promotion was created to build a marketplace association between Strathmore and writing. While it was addressed to “letter-writers everywhere,” the piece was equally a demonstration of Strathmore’s potential in identity systems, as it was a grammatical and stylistic resource for all writers of correspondence.
So companies need to assess whom they’re talking to and
what’s the best way to facilitate a conversation that shapes perceptions
among their audiences. My favorite thing about the
annual report is that it forces public companies to have internal
and external dialogue on an annual basis about where they’ve
been—and more importantly, where they’re going. And that need
isn’t going to go away.
SA: But you’re able to make the leap from corporate America to the
other side. You’re kind of a nonprofit junkie. You’ve committed time and
resources to AIGA and Anderson Ranch Art Center, Dance Aspen, the
Northern Suburban Special Education District, you served on the board
of the Chicago Art Foundation. Why not just go home and watch TV?
JK: First off, I watch plenty of TV … by the way, I love Dennis
Weaver’s work. Secondly, if there’s a cause or an organization out
there that I believe in and they can use some support, I am always
willing to help. It goes back to your question earlier. I like to focus
on a range of assignments. For example, I am a board member of
the Chicago Art Project, and I recently finished the identity program
for this group dedicated to raising visibility and exporting
Chicago artists. I also just agreed to design the program for the
Dalai Lama’s May visit to Chicago, hosted in Millennium Park.
Top: VSA’s headquarters building in Chicago’s South Loop emphasizes openness: undivided space, a 38-ft. ceiling and open floor plan, chosen for creative thinking and interaction.