From: Erik Cox
Subject: STEP cover
Date: February 24, 2006 5:56:44 PM PST
We finally were able to clear the deck and get to the cover project. It’s been a totally crazy week. Sorry.
Kind of weird to have a problem that’s about thinking wrong. It was good to see that it worked.
We definitely have some solutions we’d never come to just blindly brainstorming.
Had a very funny call with David. He’s got a bunch of stuff going on as well but seems to be into it.
Saw DJ’s note, he seems to be into it. Haven’t seen anything from Ph.D. Looking forward to seeing
what everyone does.
What was it like for the C2
team to test their own methods?
“Very odd,” Cox says.
Although he’d helped author
the exercises and administered
them to his clients, Cox hadn’t
had the opportunity to think
wrong in such a focused way.
C2 designers Daniel Choe and
Tory Ford met with Cox (and
some New Belgium beers) to
tackle the cover design in one
quick sitting.
Easy for C2 were the time
limitations and what Cox
describes as the “let go point,”
which comes a lot faster due to
their familiarity with the end
goal. “Once you get in these
methods of working, it automatically
starts producing
results,” he says. “I tend to like
the time restraints. I like the
spontaneity.”
Discarded ideas like wrapping
a monitor, Christo-style,
or creating type with twist-ties
didn’t have the level of
impact they were looking for,
especially once they realized
the value of having a face on
a design publication—something
they thought was certain
to attract attention due to
the heuristic bias of the magazine
industry itself. “The ironic
thing is that these guidelines
are created with the intention
of standing out, but every
design magazine is using the
same guidelines so every design
magazine tends to look the
same,” he says.
Piecing together three
important words throughout
their process—pink, baby, and
Eames—yielded the cover Cox
and his team thought was sure
to be a winner. And here’s one
place where Cox is certain the
think wrong way is best: Plotting
it on the high sales vs.
unexpected grid makes the
decision a bit more academic,
he says. “It removes the ‘I like
it’ response.”
RIGHT OR WRONG?
“He was sincere about following the exercises
to get somewhere but the final composition was not
necessarily pushing the limits of the way he likes to solve
problems,” says Bielenberg. “I don’t think he would have necessarily
used a baby or pink or Eames unless he was influenced
by the process, but the way he solved it graphically is
completely within a bias. However, within the language of
STEP magazine covers, a picture of a baby’s face in black and
white is definitely alternative.”
HAIKU: GET CRUNK IT WILL HELP
RED ROCKS SPEAK IN STARK VERBIAGE
3D THINGS ARE COOL
—ERIK COX, DANIEL CHOE, TORY FORD
BIELENBERG’S REACTION TO STEP’S COVER CHOICE
“I’m not surprises at the selection of the ‘baby’ cover. It’s certainly
the least risky or offensive of them all and isn’t going to
alienate anybody. Who doesn’t like a sweet little baby face?
Even though it was created using a thinking wrong exercise,
it isn’t a design solution that pushes past what might be
expected from a STEP cover.
Stefan Sagmeister once said that his best work always
took some guts. I know that thinking wrong takes guts too.
Did it take guts to run this cover? I think not.”