|
I do not envy the task of the judges for our annual Best of Web competition.
Besides the usual parameters for judging a design competition—layout,
typography, color, use of imagery—they also must consider factors
exclusive to the digital realm: interface ease-of-use, continuity, scalability,
content management, on and on.
» Continue
|
|
|
|
|
When the culture of a design school is potent enough, it can maintain a gravitational pull for its constellations of students. In order to compile this year’s Field Guide, therefore, I contacted a selection of graphic design programs both in the U.S. and further afield in Europe in search of designers emerging from, and yet still connected to, their respective schools.
January/February 2006
INTERVIEWS/PROFILES
Field Guide to Emerging Design Talent 2006
|
|
|
Alice Twemlow
There is often a certain essence of a design program—a way of thinking, a way
of making—that, however much it may be reinterpreted by every individual, can
be detected in the work of the students long after they’ve graduated. This essence
can take a tangible form in work that through use of certain combinations
of typefaces, technologies, content, and even colors, is readily identifiable. More
usually, however, a program’s ethos is traced in the approach to a piece of work—
whether it’s systems-based or intuitive; pragmatic or conceptual; referencing
scholarship or more widely available cultural values; political or poetic; and so
on. Such legacies are self-perpetuating. Fellow students often end up collaborating
or even going into business together, teachers can become employers, school
activities and events always need promoting and documenting, and it’s natural to
turn to alumni—many students even begin teaching themselves.
When the culture of a design school is potent enough, it can maintain a gravitational pull for its constellations
of students. In order to compile this year’s Field Guide, therefore, I contacted a selection of graphic design programs
both in the U.S. and further afield in Europe in search of designers emerging from, and yet still connected
to, their respective schools. Astrid Stavro lives in Barcelona but maintains a link with her graduate school the
Royal College of Art in London by designing books for them. Emily Anderson interned for a year in Minneapolis
College of Art and Design’s in-house design studio. Unlike many of his classmates, Christopher Sleboda stayed
in the town of New Haven after receiving his MFA from the Yale School of Art and has since been appointed
director of graphic design at the Yale University Art Gallery. Dustin Arnold has been helping his former professors
to develop design concepts for an upcoming conference at his alma mater, the Art Center College of Design.
Johnschen Kudos now works for his former instructor Abbott Miller as part of a team at Pentagram. Paul Sahre
was quick to recognize his student Joon Mo Kang’s talents and began to employ him even before he’d begun his
senior year at the School of Visual Arts, and Victoria Lam’s education continues in her workplace, which happens
to be the office of her California Institute of the Arts professor, Lorraine Wild. Other connections forged while
at school are maintained by the students themselves: Kudos, along with five of his Maryland Institute College
of Art classmates, has launched an online publication called Splotch Visual Pulse that explores various themes of
popular culture; Ryan Corey collaborates with other CalArts grads as The Society of Image-makers; and Andre
Andreev and G. Dan Covert met as students at California College of the Arts, reconnected while working at
MTV, and have since set up their own firm, dress code.
The STEP Field Guide itself begins to intersect with these networks. Both Stefan Bucher and Eric Olson, featured in STEP’s previous surveys of young designers, have taught some of the exceptional individuals featured in this year’s Field Guide to Emerging Design Talent.
|
|
|
|