Last spring I had coffee in New
York with my former graduate advisor,
my mentor, who is now 74.
We had a great time and I was able
to talk with her about subjects I
haven’t even been comfortable
broaching with my own mother, age
77—topics like sex in one’s 70s. My
former teacher was then off to meet
a former teacher of hers for dinner,
a woman now in her 90s with whom
she’s had a long friendship.
Sweet, isn’t it? Not completely sweet, though. My mentor is brilliant,
complex, and witty, and has odd and unpredictable fiashes
of competitiveness and aggression. Sometimes when I see her,
she’s in a contentious mood, and I leave feeling slightly bruised
and frustrated. I have my moments of aggression, too, and desires
to show her my professional muscles and to assert my differences
from her—as well as to enjoy our warmth and closeness. We have a
friendship, in other words. We’re way past teacher-student politeness
(we’ve known each other for over 25 years) and into enjoying—
and occasionally being wary of—each other’s complexities. In my
experience, that evolution from a teacher-student relationship to
true friendship has been a rare occurrence, until recently.
MENTORING VS. MOTHERING
I’m 50 now and I’m a mentor. I’ve been teaching for quite a while—
currently I’m an associate professor in visual and critical studies
and art history at The School of the Art Institute of Chicago—
and my students are in Visual and Critical Studies (VCS), art history,
and visual communications (design). I’ve been mentoring quite
a while too, which to me is a more intensive form of teaching that
includes guiding on the teacher’s part and modeling on the student’s
part. I’ve had time to get a handle on the delicate balance between
encouraging students but not playing their idealized mother. But
my female design graduate students in recent years have taken me to
a whole new stage of mentoring: friends and colleagues.
What I’d already learned was to avoid—at least as much as
possible given the dual-generational structure of teaching—a rosy
kind of mothering. Why? The idealized mother-teacher who is
traditionally selfless gives and gives; she has no time for her own
work and life. What’s the point of that? What’s the benefit to self
or productivity? And what kind of model is that for female students
hoping themselves to teach in the future?
Enter the selfish mother. Perhaps still modeling myself after
my own mentor, I try to present myself as supportive of my students,
but primarily involved in my own work. Demanding of
them and myself. My students, particularly the graduate students
in design, art history, and visual criticism—many of whom have
been out in the work world and then returned for their master’s—
understand my need to focus on my own practice. And I expect
them to do the same. My goal is to balance that parallel productivity
with the inevitable parenting role that’s raised by the transference
and counter-transference of performing other-generational
helpful authority.
But that balance was disturbed a few years ago by my graduate
students in visual communications. Then-graduate student Alyson
Priestap-Beaton was giving a report in a design issues seminar
I was teaching, and she cited Bruce Mau’s (as it turns out, overstated)
assertion that Coca-Cola had created the popular image
of Santa Claus. That ignited a bonfire discussion about how much
the ways we celebrate holidays have been influenced by corporate
culture, even some of our most sacred traditions. We felt there’d
been too much hand-wringing about the commercialization of
the holidays and not enough exploration of the traditions created
and values communicated by this process. We decided that day we
should do a book about it.
UNUSUAL COLLABORATION
In fall 2004, three years, 29 contributors, and 300-some full-color
pages later, our book, The Business of Holidays, was published by
Monacelli Press. I edited the book and coauthored it with the students
and a couple of colleagues; the graduate students wrote the
bulk of it; a team of five of them plus me did all the production
work; and the five designed it.
Lots to say about that wonderful, fun, intense, and sometimes
anxiety-producing process, but here I want to comment on my
relationships with Alyson and two other female designer/writers
on the production team, Melanie Archer and Amy Fidler. (There
were two great guys on the production team, too, but it was the
women with whom I developed the strongest mentoring relationships. Perhaps the women drew closer to me as a possible model and I to them as younger female colleagues. They also became
more involved in the book’s production than the men did.) Alyson
served as photography editor, senior photographer, coauthor, and
co-designer; Melanie as senior writer, associate editor, and co-designer;
Amy as production manager, coauthor, and co-designer.